The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a victim E (the age of 58) who works for repair in a laundry office of “D” (the age of 58) and is not well aware of the facts charged.

A. On November 2, 2015, the Defendant did not pay KRW 616,000 for the repair on the ground that there was no mind about the repair of clothes before being assigned to the victim at the “D” 'D’ shop located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F on November 2, 2015.

Therefore, the victim filed a civil lawsuit against the defendant, and the defendant found a laundry site on the ground that he/she conducted a compulsory execution between the defendant and his/her house, and threatened the victim with the view that he/she threatened the victim with the eye of the victim of the cigarette butts that he/she had talked with the victim, and threatened him/her with his/her face in his/her hand, and assaulted on the above part of the eyebrow due to his/her finger.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and on the same grounds as Paragraph (a) 1, went back to a mountain, 'the same flaps' and discarded.

And how to communicate with Cheonggents and Cheonggents

In doing so, the term "a threat of harm and injury" was announced, such as frighting, and frighting.

(c)

The Defendant: (a) at the same time, at the same place; (b) for reasons such as subsection (a) the G, a laundry employee, died when she did so.

In other words, the victim was insultd by openly hacker, hacker’s hack and hacker’s hak.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Articles 260(1), 283(1), and 311 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will pursuant to Articles 260(3), 283(3), and 312(1) of the same Act, or may be prosecuted upon the victim’s complaint.

In this regard, since the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant in this court after the prosecution and expresses his/her intention to revoke the complaint, this is raised by Article 327 (5) and (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.