logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.08.16 2018고단1321
협박등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

Summary of Facts charged

1. Around December 27, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim at one time due to the victim C (the spouse, the 30 years of age) and family problems in the Defendant’s residence in Gwangju Mine District B No. 1002, the 22:45, Dec. 27, 2017.

2. The Defendant of intimidation, on the date, time, and place set forth in paragraph 1, and on the ground that the victim C reported 112 and dispatched to the site to the police officer “to be punished against the Defendant”, b), knife to die with knife.

"In the end, the victim was threatened."

However, among the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of assault is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the charge of intimidation is an offense falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and the charge of intimidation is not charged against the victim’s express intent under Articles 260(3) and 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

On April 10, 2018, after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the victim agreed smoothly with the defendant and submitted a letter of revocation of complaint to this court.

Therefore, the indictment of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the expression of intent to punish the defendant was withdrawn.

arrow