logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2017.09.25 2014가합2682
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's KRW 401,989,50 for each of the plaintiffs and 5% per annum from March 21, 2013 to September 25, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs (hereinafter the Plaintiffs (hereinafter the Plaintiff Il Il-il Appraisal Corporation) are corporations with the objective of appraising the economic value of land, etc. and appraising the results thereof at the price. The Defendant is a public corporation established pursuant to the Korea Gas Corporation Act with the aim of contributing to promoting the convenience of people’s lives and improving public welfare by laying the foundation for the stable supply of gas in the long term.

B. In relation to the operation of the common production base located in the ebbbbial stability in the ebbial drawing, the Defendant: (a) on July 29, 2008, requested the Plaintiffs to appraise the amount of fishery loss from the operation of the common production base and the amount of fishery loss from the secondary construction of the common production base (hereinafter “each of the instant appraisal”); (b) on October 21, 2008, the Defendant entered into a separate contract with the Korea Institute for Marine Science and Research (hereinafter “BG”) and the joint research institute of the common production base and the joint fishery damage investigation service contract for the secondary construction project.

C. On April 30, 2012, the Defendant sent a written notification to the Plaintiffs on April 30, 2012 that each of the instant appraisal and assessment could not be promoted as the instant contract for investigation of fishery damage was rescinded, and that the said written notification would have withdrawn the request for appraisal and assessment. This reached the Plaintiff’s dialogue appraisal on May 4, 2012 and May 2, 2012.

Plaintiff

On June 11, 2012, and on May 7, 2012, the Plaintiff’s dialogue appraisal requested each Defendant to provide a final report on the investigation into injury, which was submitted by the vice-major research institute to the Defendant, but the Defendant notified the Defendant that each of the instant evaluations was withdrawn.

Accordingly, on March 4, 2013, the Plaintiff Park Il-il appraisal and on March 12, 2013, the Plaintiff Park Il-il appraisal are objectioned to each Defendant on March 12, 2013.

arrow