The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the summary of the grounds of appeal (misunderstanding the facts about forced indecent act) CCTV video CDs, etc., the defendant can be found to have committed an indecent act by intentionally using the victim's her butt her mare, but the judgment of the court below acquitted the defendant on this part of the facts charged, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts.

2. Determination

A. On January 7, 2017, the Defendant’s charge of compulsory indecent act is not required to send the customer E, who is a business owner, to himself/herself, in the “D” letter or “D” letter or letter located in Gui-si C on January 7, 2017.

“A indecent act was committed by force against the victim in such a way that the victim’s her her mare her mared with a her mared,” and the following was forced.

B. The lower court determined that the victim E’s written statement was inadmissible since the Defendant did not consent to the use of the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

However, this part of the facts charged is denied to the effect that there was no intention to commit an indecent act in the course of the victim’s resistance. However, insofar as there was no additional evidence, such as the victim’s statement, etc. as to the method and mode of indecent act in this case, circumstances before and after the prosecution, etc., it is insufficient to acknowledge this part of the facts charged solely on the investigation report and the results of reproduction of CCTV video CDs, and on the grounds that there was no other evidence to acknowledge this, the Defendant was not guilty of this part of

(c).