Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants: (a) as residents of the D Apartment at Ansan-si; (b) as the representatives of occupants; (c) Defendant B and Defendant C were the general citizens of the Senior Citizens Association; and (d) the victims E who were auditors of the council of occupants’ representatives did not cooperate with the request for submission of data related to the joint electricity refund, etc.; and (b) conspired with F, the president of the council of occupants’ representatives, prior to the council of occupants’ representatives, to slander the victims by posting the former

1. 전단지 게시에 의한 명예훼손 피고인들은 위 F과 함께, 2013. 1. 20. 18:00경 위 D아파트에서 ‘2011년 G 공동전기료 환급금 영수증 제출촉구’라는 제목으로 ‘ (전략) 환급을 해주어야 하는 약 4,300만 원을 D관리사무소에서 관리를 해야 함에도 불구하고, 임차인 대표인 E 감사 및 임차인대표들이 이 돈의 수령권인 D아파트 임차인을 배제하여 불법을 행사한 G과 동조하여 관리사무소가 아닌 G 측에서 환급금을 관리한 것은 직무상 배임죄에 해당됨을 밝힙니다.

(중략) 증빙근거 영수증과 계좌입금 서류를 2013년 1월 25일까지 입주자 대표회의에제출하지 않을 시에는 전임차인 대표 감사 직무를 맡은 E를 직무에 관한 배임죄로 형사상 고발과 D아파트가 이로 인한 손해로 입은 민사상 손해배상책임을 청구할 것임을 밝힙니다.

The former part of the apartment building 101 unit and 102 unit were attached to the above apartment building 101 unit and 102 unit. However, in fact, there was no fact that the victim had the right to manage the refund amount in G or had not concealed evidentiary materials, such as receipts. 2. On January 23, 2013, the Defendants of defamation by the former part of the apartment building as the title, “Interference with the duties of the council of occupants’ representatives and the claim for damages,” with the former part of the said F, and as the title, “Interference with the duties of the council of occupants’ representatives and the claim for damages.