logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2016.05.04 2016고단126
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 9, 2015, the Defendant injured the victim B, at the Defendant’s house located in Gangnam-si C and 604 dong 1204 dong 1204 on November 9, 2015, the Defendant asked the Defendant’s cell phone at late at the Defendant’s house, asked the Defendant’s cell phone at late at the Defendant’s house, thereby checking the Defendant’s cell phone, the victim’s face is 15 times by hand, leading the victim’s head car, leading the victim’s body several times, thereby impairing the victim’s face face that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Around 07:55 on November 9, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties against the victim D, and the Defendant injured the victim D (26 Does) who was a policeman belonging to the Gangnam Police Station, who was called up after receiving a 112 report, left the knee in the knee and walked off the knebbbbbbbbs, and faced with the Defendant’s knee.

As above, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers regarding the prevention and suppression of crimes D, and at the same time, failed to observe the above D when it is necessary to provide approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to D and B;

1. B written statements;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. In cases of injury to each of the pertinent Articles of the Criminal Act and each of the judgments of the choice of punishment: Interference with the performance of official duties in the judgment of Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (amended by imprisonment with labor for the crime of injury as stated in the judgment No. 1. 1.): Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrence and the choice of a sentence (the two crimes specified in the judgment below, the two crimes specified in the judgment below, and the punishment specified in the judgment below, and the choice of imprisonment);

1. former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (an aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes as provided for in paragraph (2); 2. Aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes as provided for in Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the same Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. To observe the protection and observation in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and to observe the protection;

arrow