logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.05.14 2014고정529
경범죄처벌법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 14, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the disturbance of revocation of the owner of a government office): (a) on the part of the Defendant: (b) 02:30 on June 14, 2013; (c) on the part of the police box, which is a government office located in Suwon-gu B, carried a cab and did not pay KRW 4,600 on the cab and did not pay KRW 4,600 on the cab; and (d) on the part of the cab driver, the Defendant returned

However, the Defendant, at around 02:50 on the same day, visited the police officer, disregarded his request for returning home more than several times on the same day, and committed an act of disturbance by uttering very rough words and actions, such as “Is away from the night, shot, shot,” and “Is away from the night,” to G police officers working in Korea over a total of 20 minutes from around 03:10 on the same day.

2. At around 04:30 on the same day, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender due to the above damage to public goods, at least 1.2 meters in width and 2.2 meters in length at the center of the main station of the Suwon Police Station, which is a public goods, in the process of taking a new disease into custody to the Suwon Police Station located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 873-4, and damaged public goods equivalent to 80,000 won in estimate of the repair.

3. On May 1, 2007, the Defendant was a person holding HEF Laol Nos. 1 and operated the said vehicle without concluding a new renewal contract, despite the expiration of the mandatory automobile insurance contract term, and on March 28, 2009, the Defendant operated the said vehicle not covered by the mandatory insurance in the agricultural cooperative located in Young-si, Young-gu, Suwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on March 28, 2009.

Summary of Evidence

[The points of paragraphs 1 and 2 in the market]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Investigative report and automatic photo (the point referred to in paragraph (3) at the center of the police station which is damaged;

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Details of registers of non-insurance operations violations, notification of vehicles not covered by mandatory insurance, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing compulsory insurance contracts;

1. Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act applicable to facts constituting a crime, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act applicable to the method of cancellation of the owner of a government office.

arrow