The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Article 44(1)1 of the Act on Promotion of the Game Industry provides that a person who causes others to gamble or perform other speculative acts, or leaves others unattended to do so, in violation of Article 28 subparag. 2 of the same Act. Here, the speculative act refers to “the act of collecting property or property from many people and determining the acquisition and loss of property by an infeasible method” (Article 2(1)1 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc.). The court below acquitted the Defendant of the facts of the charges by misapprehending the legal principles on the facts charged, the judgment below acquitted the Defendant of the facts of this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, by misapprehending the legal principles.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the same from March 23, 2012 to the same year.

7. 13.경까지 울산 동구 C에 있는 피고인 운영의 D게임장에서 게임물등급위원회의 등급분류를 받은 청소년 이용불가 아케이드 게임물인 '오대양스토리' 게임기 70대를 설치하고 그곳을 찾은 불특정 다수의 손님들로 하여금 게임기에 현금을 투입하고 자동실행장치인 속칭 ‘똑딱이’를 이용하여 자동으로 게임을 진행하게 하여 게임을 통해 획득한 점수가 20,000점 이상이 되면 이를 다시 이용할 수 있는 점수보관증을 발급하여 주는...