logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.02.19 2012고단1795
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, Defendant C and D by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of "J game room" with one story (87.78 square meters) in Ansan-si, Ansan-si. Defendant B is the manager of the above game room, and Defendant C and D are the employees in the above game room.

Defendant

A and B set up 80 game machines called “dlimgs” in the above game room and offered them for the use of the dlimgs. Defendant C and D offered monthly wages from the above A, and offered a game room business by lending the name of the business owner to A and working as an employee, or by printing out a certificate of 10,000 points per 10 points per customer according to the points acquired by customers.

No game products related business entity shall gamble, perform other speculative acts, or leave game products to do so by using a game product.

Nevertheless, from February 9, 201 to May 25, 2011, the Defendants conspired to make customers input cash in the game machine and let them play the game using the game in question, and upon the request of customers to return WIN creative scores, which are the result obtained through the game, the Defendants issued a certificate of keeping points indicating the points.

However, the defendants knew that the above custody certificate is a cash transaction among customers in the above game room and that customers knew that they are using the above game for the purpose of exchanging in cash by acquiring a custody certificate, so they recommended or impliedly approved customers to exchange a custody certificate and cash between them.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion to allow customers to engage in gambling and other speculative acts using game products by issuing a certificate of custody to facilitate exchange among customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each part of the defendants.

arrow