beta본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.24 2016나31755
위약벌 등
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
The reasoning of this court is as follows, except for the rejection of each description of Gap evidence Nos. 12 through 15 (including each number), which is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion as additional evidence submitted in the trial, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.