The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle of Ddoglon.

On March 27, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on March 27, 2014, and changed the two-lane roads in front of Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul into a two-lane course from the offside of Taewon-gu to the green square basin.

In such cases, the defendant engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to change the traffic situation and safely so as not to impede the passage of other vehicles in the way that he/she intends to change.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and has changed his course for a long time.

In the same direction, the victim Furton car's right-hand side of the G Furton car, followed by the fenced part of the car above Aur loan's left-hand side.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, destroyed the car of the above Bosch Rexton to be approximately KRW 859,478,00 for repair costs, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

2. The burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial for judgment is to be borne by a public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on evidence with probative value that makes a judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, the suspicion of guilt is between the defendant, even if there is no such evidence.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(See Supreme Court Decisions 2002Do6110 delivered on February 11, 2003, 2005Do2342 delivered on June 24, 2005, etc.). According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the Defendant shocked the F driver’s vehicle during the process of driving the said Adlon vehicle and changing the lane (hereinafter “instant accident”), and the Defendant, however, immediately.