logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.02.06 2017고단1158
업무상횡령등
Text

Defendant

A A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, by a fine of KRW 4 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The F organization is a non-profit private organization that implements business related to women with subsidies and organizations granted by local governments, etc. in order to promote women's rights and interests, improve their status, etc.

Defendant

C is a person who served as the Secretary General of the above Council from July 1, 2001 to September 15, 201, and was in charge of all administrative affairs and fund execution affairs.

Defendant

B As the president of the F organization from March 2015 to March, 2015, the person who is in charge of the affairs of the F organization, and the Defendant A, from May 2015 to May 2015, is a person in charge of all administrative affairs and funding.

1. In order to resolve the financial difficulties caused by the shortage of funds to be appropriated by the F organization, Defendant C appropriated the amount to be paid in excess of the amount to be actually paid in the course of paying subsidies from local governments, etc., and received the difference and received the difference from the F organization to appropriate it for the insufficient operating expenses, etc. of the said Council.

On April 8, 2011, the Defendant received KRW 12,00,000,00 from Gangwon-do as a subsidy for “H” projects, which is a “G” project, from Gangwon-do, and deposited it into the Agricultural Cooperative Account (I), which is an exclusive subsidy passbook for the F organization, and kept it on behalf of the victim.

On May 19, 201, the Defendant transferred KRW 2,100,000 to the J, which was the actual printing cost of KRW 800,000,000, and then returned KRW 1,170,000 from J to the NA account, which is the account of the victimized person’s other accounts, and used the amount for the use of the Council’s operating expenses, which is not the use of subsidies, around that time.

In addition, from around that time to December 12, 2012, the Defendant returned total of KRW 3,090,000 to other accounts in the name of the victim for five times, as shown in Appendix I.

arrow