logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.12.03 2015고단1166
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

No. 1 through 8 of this Act shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 11, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on March 29, 2014 in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch of the Daegu District Court for the violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 29, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. No one who provides game products with the contents different from the rating obtained for the use thereof shall provide such game products for the distribution or use of the contents different from the rating obtained by the Game Products Committee;

Nevertheless, from September 14, 2013 to September 17:40, 2013, the Defendant established 40 new game machine in the Financial Gameland operated by the Defendant in the Gu and Si from September 14, 2013, and provided customers with game products different from the rating received by the Defendant by providing many unspecified customers with a game product that is different from the rating received by the Defendant by providing them to use the said game machine, regardless of the user’s ability, if the said game machine enters a specific section different from the rating received.

2. No one who has had another person perform speculative acts using game products, shall perform any speculative act by using the game products, or leave the same to do so;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the game room at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, and, if many unspecified customers using the foregoing remodeled game machine bring about the item card from the game machine, had the employees of the above game room engage in the speculative act by exchanging KRW 9,000, after deducting KRW 1,000 per item card from the money exchange merchant G.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement (the fact in paragraph (2) is recognized on the market, but the fact in paragraph (1) is denied because he/she had different knowledge in the changed market);

1. The witness H.

arrow