beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for six months, respectively.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 2014, Defendant A’s sole crime committed by Defendant A, at the victim D’s house located in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju Dong-gu, employment of the victim E as temporary worker in the social welfare department of Gwangjubuk-gu, while allowing the victim to become a regular employee after two years.
As four persons, including B, who will help find employment, have to provide meals, they said that their cost would change the amount of KRW 300,000.”
However, at the time, the Defendant had been working for night guard at the construction site without a certain occupation, and even if he had operated the Do F Sales Office, he did not have any relation to the employment in the Gu office of Gwangjubuk-gu, and there was no way to hire the injured’s father and wife as temporary worker in the social welfare department of the Gu office of Gwangjubuk-gu, and even if he received money from the injured person, he did not have the intent or ability to hire the victimized’s father and wife in the Gu office of Gwangju-gu.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received 300,000 won from the victim by deceiving the victim as well as from the victim to receive 300,000 won as a guard, from that time, the Defendant received five assets worth KRW 7,80,000,000 as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table from that time to the Haman on December 2014.
2. Defendant B, around December 2014, committed the joint crime of the Defendants, Defendant B, “A expressed to Defendant A that it is necessary to have his/her husband and wife married and to keep his/her husband and wife employed his/her husband and wife, and Defendant A consented thereto.”
Accordingly, on December 22, 2014, Defendant A had the victim find employment at the victim’s home of the above victim.
B marks that the date of attendance is written and known in writing to the locking in the face of the week.
“.....”
However, at the time, the Defendants did not have any relation to the employment in the North-gu Office of Gwangju and the Veterans Office, and received money from the victims and used it for other purposes, such as Defendant B’s living cost.