logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.09.13 2018고단295 (1)
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

(a) No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer any access medium;

On December 11, 2017, the Defendant and C conspired to transfer the access media upon receipt of a proposal from D, a branch of C, to transfer the access media, 60,000 won per account when transferring the access media, such as physical cards connected to the account under the Defendant’s name.

On December 11, 2017, around 12:06, the Defendant and C conspiredd as above, in front of F elementary schools located in Sanyang-gu, Sanyang-si, Sanyang-si, the Defendant prepared one physical card each connected to G bank account (H) and I bank account (J) in his own name, and C notified D of the above account number by telephone, and C moved the Defendant to K7 cars to the front way of F elementary school by moving the Defendant to F.m., who was under the direction of L, an accomplice, and the Defendant added two above physical card to F.m.

Accordingly, the defendant and C transferred the access media.

B. The Defendant and C, on December 11, 2017, at the frontway of the F elementary school located in Sanyang-gu, Sanyang-si, Sanyang-si, Sanyang-si, Sanyang-si, the Defendant and C, as described in the above A-mentioned paragraph, opened the above M-B W-B card, and deposited money from the above D to the account in the name of “A”, and the withdrawal should not be easily made.

“At the request of L to withdraw the money and bring the money to L,” there was an invitation to withdraw and deliver the cash deposited in the account under the name of the said Defendant.

The defendant and C did not say that the above L is absolutely true to the employees or police officers of financial institutions, and the above money was ordered to make a false statement that it was borrowed money from the personal business fund or the third village for fraud. The defendant and C considered that the money deposited into the account in the defendant's name through the process of raising the limit of withdrawal from the above L and D and receiving the order to have the physical card reissued, and continuously received the demand for withdrawal from the above L and D.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.

arrow