1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claim selected by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the plaintiff added the judgment as to the selective claims added by the court of first instance as set forth in the following 2. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is

2. Determination on the claim for damages caused by tort

A. The Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff did not have the intent or ability to pay wages, retirement allowances, etc. to the Plaintiff, but had the Plaintiff work as the representative director from August 201 to July 31, 2015.

Since the defendant's act constitutes a tort by deceiving the plaintiff, and the defendant has gained a considerable amount of property interest, such as the plaintiff's wage during the above period, it is obligated to pay the plaintiff the amount stated in the claim as compensation for damages caused by the tort.

B. In light of the judgment, the evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge the tort of the Plaintiff’s assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim should be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the court of first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim on the ground of a corporate father, is justifiable with this conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's claim for selective addition in this court are dismissed as it is without merit.