logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.10.02 2018나115977
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claims added by this court are all dismissed.

2. Action after the filing of an appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is to dismiss “the Defendant” as “the Plaintiff,” and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for adding the following judgments as to the claim for damages which the Plaintiff selected in the trial of first instance, thereby citing it as it is.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff is obligated to pay KRW 162,00,000 as damages for tort, since the Defendant conspireds with G and A to forge the written resolution of the non-party clan and entered into a sales contract with the Plaintiff, and received KRW 162,00,000,00 for the purchase price.

G has been recognized as prior to the conclusion of a sales contract with the Plaintiff by forging the resolution, etc. of the non-party clan, but the fact that the Defendant issued a certificate of personal seal impression and a certificate of personal seal impression to the non-party clan to use it in the public hearing and written consent related to the compensation of the non-party clan land owned by the non-party clan is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant participated in the above

The plaintiff's assertion on this part is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant in conclusion must be dismissed for all reasons.

Since the part of the judgment of the first instance against the defendant is consistent with this conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed, and the claim for damages added by this court is also dismissed.

arrow