beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than nine months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 18, 2017, the Defendant posted a letter stating “to sell response 1988 DV Round 198” on the Rober’s “China countries,” which is the Internet portal site, and the Defendant said that “to send the said DV mos if deposit is made” to the victim F who reported it.
However, even if the defendant did not have the above VD and received the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to sell the above VD.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he received 320,000 won from the new bank account (Account Number: G) in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim as the price for goods and received 3,905,500 won in total from the victims about 20 times in the same manner as the list of crimes in the attached Form.
Accordingly, the defendant acquired the victims' property by deceit.
2. The Defendant, around June 26, 2017, up to 2017, posted a letter “sale of traffic cards” on the Internet website NVV and the Korean car page, and made a false statement to the victim H, who had contacted with the Internet site, stating that “if sending money, sending money, sending the traffic cards.”
However, even if the Defendant did not hold a traffic card and receives the payment from the injured party, he/she send the object.
there was no intention or ability to act.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 110,00 from the victim’s account (I) in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim, and received KRW 1,141,300 in total five times from around that time to July 26, 2017 through the above method, as described in the list of crimes in the attached Table.
Accordingly, the defendant acquired the victims' property by deceit.
3. On August 7, 2017, the Defendant of 2017 Goyang-si, the Defendant’s residence of the Defendant, 102 Dong 1807, and the Internet: