logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.03.23 2016고단1257
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant of the 2016 Highest 1257, Oct. 8, 2016, the Defendant sold 200,000 won to the Internet “Neber Highest Republic,” regardless of the absence of intention or capacity to sell the mar vehicle,” in the Internet “Neber Highest Republic,” regardless of the absence of intention or capacity to sell the mar vehicle.

“In writing,” the victim transferred KRW 200,000 to the national bank account (Account Number 6404040104327427) in the name of a distribution bank in the name of the same day from the victim D to the next day.

From this point to December 5, 2016, the Defendant received a total of KRW 9,160,000 from 75 victims in the same manner through the same 75 times in the same place as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table (1).

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

The Defendant, “2017 Highest 52,” on November 10, 2016, is pop-up to 70,000 won on the Internet “Nber Highest Republic” page, regardless of the absence of the intent or ability to sell used goods through the Internet.

In writing to the effect that “,” the victim received KRW 70,000 from the victim E to the bank account of F on the same day.

In addition, from November 10, 201 to May 15, 2016, the Defendant acquired a total of KRW 719,000 in the same way as the sales price for used goods in the same way five times, such as the list of crimes (2) in attached Form 1.

On August 1, 2016, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 70, 2017,” expressed that he/she would sell protek-car to the Internet “NVand Highest Republic of Korea” camera, and reported this to the victim G, who had contacted with the Defendant, would first remitted the price to the victim G and then send the protek-car to his/her choice.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above goods to the injured party.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and receives 110,000 won from the victim's account on the same day.

arrow