logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.01.19 2017고정332
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 28, 2017, the Defendant was a person who was the president of the Do branch of the Do branch of the Do branch of the organization, and was appointed by the president of the Do branch of the Do branch of the Do branch of the organization, and the term of office expired on April 6, 2017, and the Defendant lost its authority as the president of the branch of the Do branch. On April 7, 2017, the personnel committee at which the Do branch of the Do branch held the Do branch of the Do branch of the Do was elected and appointed as

Although the Defendant, from April 7, 2017, received and transferred the duties, etc. to the victim appointed as the president of the new Gunsan Branch, the victimized person interfered with the duty of confirmation of the list of members and contact details, receipt of national subsidies, and receipt and issuance of official documents inside and outside the country by correcting the office entrance of the head of the Gunsan-si E in the Gunsan-si building from around April 7, 2017 to the present date.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's C's task of the North Korean branch of the North Korean branch of the Do branch by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Investigation report (Submission of internal regulations, etc. related to the procedure for appointment of chief executive officers of the C organization) (where a injured person is disqualified as chief executive officers of the sub-chapters, if he/she is appointed as chief executive officers of the sub-chapters by the former sub-chapters, the transferee of the injured person's affairs as chief executive officers constitutes a business requiring protection under the Criminal Act, and if he/she, prior to following legal procedures, such as provisional disposition, the Defendant corrected entrance doors to reject the transferee and prevented him/her from entering the victim, he/she shall be deemed to have an intention to interfere with his/her affairs

Application of Statutes

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow