logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.20 2013가단85406
건물명도등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

On April 8, 2012, the Plaintiff, as the cause of the instant claim, leased the real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Defendant with a deposit of KRW 200 million, monthly rent of KRW 11 million, and a five-year period fixed. The Defendant’s failure to pay the rent from May 2012 to termination of the lease agreement verbally on or around April 2013, arguing that the said real estate is handed over and the amount equivalent to the rent is sought.

In full view of the purport of the argument in the evidence No. 3, Eul, the plaintiff's husband, and Eul is the actual manager and owner of Eul corporation E, which operates D new points, which are real estate listed in the attached list, and without any authority from the plaintiff, on April 9, 2012, in the real estate lease contract form printed at D headquarters, around April 11, 2012, the "location" column is "20 million won" in the "Seoul-do, the "Seoul-si, the 120, and the 29," and "the 200,000 won" in the "Seoul-do," the "Monthly rent" column, "A" and "B" with the defendant's seal attached in advance. Thus, the lease contract of this case is concluded between C and the defendant, and the plaintiff is not a party, and the plaintiff's argument is dismissed without any authority.

arrow