logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.05.11 2017고단7115 (1)
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person of "2017 Highest 7115" shall borrow or lend any approaching medium, or store, deliver or distribute any approaching medium, while receiving, demanding or promising to receive compensation.

On April 22, 2016, the Defendant solicited B and C to offer money in the name of a legal entity, and consented thereto. On April 22, 2016, the Defendant opened one account in the name of “F” at the Dong branch of the E Bank located in the Gu-U.S. (U.D.) and received and delivered the connection C card and OTP to B.

As a result, the Defendant promised to keep, deliver, and distribute access media.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement, each legal statement of the defendant C, the defendant H, and the defendant I;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to H, C, I, J, K, and B;

1. Report on internal investigation (as to attachment of response data at the former tax office), data on L and F corporations, report on internal investigation (as to attachment of response data at the latter tax office), L and internal investigation (as to L corporation registry and attachment of related data), L corporation-related data, report on internal investigation (as to F corporation registry and attachment of related data, such as certified copies of relevant data), data related to L corporation, F corporation-related data, investigation report ( as to L corporation account analysis), data on opening and issuance of access media, investigation report ( as to F corporation account analysis), data on opening of and access to the account, investigation report (as to the F corporation account analysis), report on internal investigation (as to the remittance account opened by the person under suspicion), financial transaction details, report on internal investigation (as to the financial account transaction details set up by the person under consideration), details on internal

1. Article 49 (2) 2 of the relevant Act and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment is highly harmful to society by creating a large number of victims and disturbing economic order.

arrow