Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

On February 18, 2012, the Defendants, together with C, drinked alcoholic beverages in the G restaurant operated by E and F couple of the Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, and on around 22:57 of the same day, E arranged a restaurant and called “Isn't comply with this, so Isn't take a bath to E and F.

Therefore, the victim I (the age of 41) of the assistant police box belonging to the Daejeon Police Station, called the above restaurant after receiving a 112 report that "the son gets off the son," was sent to the above restaurant, and after ascertaining the situation, he asked the defendants and C about his personal information.

The defendant B stated that "the son was identified from the son," and the defendant A removed the son's kn't with the victim's kn't with the kn't with the kn't with the kn't with the kn't with the kn't with the kn't with the kn't with the kn't with the kn't with the victim's k'

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the performance of official duties by legitimate police officers on the investigation into crimes, suppression of crimes, and arrest of flagrant offenders under 112 reports, and at the same time, the victims put approximately two weeks of treatment to the right strings and the right strings.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to E, F, and I;

1. Photographs of the damaged scene and photographs of the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. The Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 257 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who choose to impose punishment: Each selective fine

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A’s judgment on the assertion by Defendant A under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is an act with the spirit of alcohol.