logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.02.12 2013노522
변호사법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts (Article 2 of the Decree of Crimes) The defendant's 6 million won received from C Co., Ltd. shall not be paid for the defendant's labor provided to the above company and received legal affairs as wages.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (a fine of KRW 4 million, an additional collection of KRW 6.1 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court of first instance on the assertion of mistake of facts, the defendant dealt with the preparation of legal documents about the lawsuit against F of the C Co., Ltd. for the entire prohibition of payment, and in return, it can be sufficiently recognized that this part of the facts charged against the defendant, including the fact that he received a total of 6 million won from I, the representative director of the said company, and this part of the charges

B. We examine the argument of unfair sentencing, and consider the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and various conditions of sentencing as shown in the oral argument, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the court below is deemed appropriate, and therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not reasonable, since the crime of this case was committed without a lawyer's lawyer's qualification by preparing legal documents about the case of this case, and the nature of the crime and circumstances are bad in light of its contents. The court below sentenced the fine of 5 million won notified in the initial summary order to 4 million won, considering all favorable circumstances for the defendant already favorable to the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow