logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.09.20 2018고정859
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 22, 2018, the Defendant driven a rocketing car at around 15:29, and went into operation of the C rocketing car at around 15:29, the Defendant went into operation on the 6nd page of the E kindergarten located in Nam-gu, Gwangju, and went into operation on the 7nd page of the E kindergarten located in Gwangju. Since it is a child protection zone, the Defendant, while neglecting the duty of care to safely drive while paying attention to children’s safety, caused the Defendant’s injury, such as the victim F (5 years, n) who was driven on the left side of the above vehicle due to the negligence of driving the vehicle while neglecting the duty of care to safely drive the vehicle while neglecting the duty of care to ensure children’s safety.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G statements;

1. Each photograph (the list Nos. 5 and 6);

1. Application of accident video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 3(1) and 3(2)11 (proviso) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act [Article 11 of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act provides that a crosswalk sign and a crosswalk sign shall be installed on a crosswalk, and in a case where crossing signal is installed, a crosswalk sign shall be installed. However, on the road in which the instant accident occurred, a crosswalk sign and a pedestrian crossing sign shall be installed. However, the crossing signal is installed on the road in which the instant accident occurred, but the crossing signal was not operated (in the facts charged, that a yellow-off signal signal was a yellow-off signal).

stated) separate signs of crosswalks have been installed.

Inasmuch as there is no evidence to determine the person, it cannot be readily concluded that the above crosswalk is a crosswalk installed in accordance with the standards set forth in the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act, and therefore, Article 3(2) proviso proviso of Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement

1. The reasons for sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are to recognize the defendant's mistake.

arrow