(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2018.02.09 2016고정244

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2018.02.09 2016고정244

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant is a person engaged in driving a taxi for Category C Launa business.

On August 26, 2016, the Defendant was driving the above taxi on August 26, 2016 and temporarily temporarily shut down in front of the Haan apartment house in the Song-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, but started in the direction of the third distance in front of the Hoan apartment.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to build the crosswalk at the place where the crosswalk is installed so as not to obstruct pedestrians' walking.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and immediately left the front, and neglected to do so, caused the victim D (5 ) who was a victim of the crosswalk where Kwikset was boarding the crosswalk in the direction of the Medan apartment complex 3 in the direction of the Medan apartment complex in the direction of the Medan apartment, and opened it over to the right-hand side of the Defendant’s front taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered damages to the reputation of the head of the above victim, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

Judgment

Although the facts charged are insufficient, it is based on the premise that the instant accident occurred due to the Defendant’s breach of his duty to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk under Article 27(1) of the Road Traffic Act (Article 27(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, i.e., Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

The following facts and circumstances are acknowledged according to the evidence adopted and examined by this Court, including CDs recorded in the situation at that time and the result of the verification by this Court.

① Before the instant accident, the Defendant temporarily suspended the vehicle in front of the crosswalk, but started the vehicle while there was no pedestrian on the crosswalk.

2. The defendant shall keep to the right side of the vehicle at the time of departure as above.

참조조문

-교통사고처리 특례법 제3조 제2항

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2016.04.26 2016고단584

-인천지방법원 2019.07.05 2018노3853

-제주지방법원 2014.02.20 2014고단73

-울산지방법원 2013.02.18 2012고정1178

-대구지방법원 안동지원 2018.11.30 2018고정101