beta
Text
1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 35,056,40 and KRW 18,706,00 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 16,350,400 from November 1, 2017.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is an individual entrepreneur engaged in printing, copying, and providing related goods with the trade name “C,” and the Defendant received various copies, etc. from the Plaintiff.
B. On October 13, 2016, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant KRW 18,706,00, totaling KRW 11,350,000 on December 13, 2016, KRW 6,108,00 on November 24, 2016, and KRW 18,706,00 on December 13, 2016.
The defendant agreed to pay the price of each of the above supplied goods to the plaintiff in installments in August, September, 2017.
C. Around July 24, 2018, the Plaintiff completed the text equivalent to KRW 16,350,400 for the supply price of D 1,000 as requested by the Defendant.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1 to 4, purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the total amount of KRW 35,056,400 (=18,706,000 won) and delay damages therefrom, barring any special circumstance.
B. As to the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant stated that there was a defect in the goods amounting to KRW 18,706,00 in the aggregate that the Plaintiff supplied to the Defendant on October 13, 2016, November 24, 2016, and December 13, 2016 (the Defendant stated to the effect that “goods have become lost” in the summary of the issues arranged by the summary of September 30, 2019, but the Defendant acted as above.
(2) Although it is alleged that the Plaintiff cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s claim, there is no evidence to acknowledge it, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit. 2) The Defendant alleged to the effect that the Plaintiff cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s claim since it is in custody of the goods equivalent to KRW 16,350,40,00 which the Plaintiff completed the Plaintiff’s present text, and thus, the fact that the Plaintiff is in custody of KRW 850 out of KRW 1,00 which the Plaintiff completed the present text is recognized. However, in full view of the purport of the argument as to KRW 16,350,40 as to KRW 16,350,40, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff in full and received goods.