1. The Defendant’s KRW 31,804,300 as well as 5% per annum from October 1, 2016 to April 21, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

1. The fact that the Plaintiff’s obligation to pay the processing price to the Plaintiff was completed from June 4, 2016 to September 30, 2016 by the Defendant and then did not receive KRW 31,804,30,00 for the processing price, is not disputed between the parties, or that the Defendant’s obligation to pay the processing price was not satisfied in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as set forth in subparagraph 1-1 to 4.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 31,804,300 won of the processed amount payable to the plaintiff and damages for delay at the rate of 5% per annum prescribed in the Civil Act and 15% per annum as requested by the plaintiff from October 1, 2016 to April 21, 2017, the delivery date of a copy of the complaint in this case, and from the following day to the date of full payment.

2. As to the defendant's defense, the defendant asserts to the purport that the defendant's defense is not set off against the plaintiff's processed payment claim of this case or deducted from the processed payment claim of this case, and therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case cannot be complied with, since it is not sufficient to set off against the plaintiff's processed payment claim of this case or deducted from the processed payment.

On the other hand, as the defendant alleged above, there is no evidence to prove that the defendant has a claim against the plaintiff, such as a valley work cost, etc., and the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.