logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.11.26 2015가합3175
정정보도
Text

1. The defendant

A. The online media htp:/www.media d.co. within seven days from the date the judgment of this case became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a legal entity established pursuant to the Broadcasting Act in order to establish a fair and sound broadcasting culture and to efficiently implement domestic and overseas broadcasts. The defendant is a periodical publisher with the main purpose of promoting the dynamic speech through the Onnuri media.

A was designated as a candidate B, the Plaintiff organized a verification team inside the Plaintiff for reporting candidate verification.

At the editing meeting of the Editors, the verification team proposed news coverage of A candidate's suspicion of omission of capital gains tax.

However, during the meeting, the article was determined to be reported on D and E Sundays, and eventually, D and F, the article related to the suspicion of omission of capital gains tax of A's candidate (hereinafter "D") was reported as the title of D and E.

After the above report, the candidate A resisted the Plaintiff with no omission of capital gains tax, and immediately disclosed a sales contract to verify the fact, and requested the Plaintiff to issue an article so that wrong reports do not spread through the Internet news.

At around 00:00, the Plaintiff deleted the article posted on the Plaintiff’s website, and the above article was deleted on the portal site.

Plaintiff

On the following day after the deletion of the article, management explained the process of the article deletion decision to the news reporters.

In the online media story published by the G Defendant, the Defendant reported the same article as the article in the attached Form (hereinafter “instant article”) as the article in the title of the article in question.

[Ground of recognition] In accordance with Article 14 of the Act on Press Arbitration and Remedies, etc. for Damage Caused by Press Reports, Party A’s statements, Party A’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 7, and Party B’s evidence Nos. 3 (including various numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the overall purport of the pleadings, and the legal principles related to the press report and remedy for damage caused by Press Reports.

arrow