The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2016. 7. 27. 09:00 경 경북 영덕군 C에 있는 ‘D PC 방 ’에서 ‘E’ 게임을 하던 중, 온라인 상에서 같이 게임을 하던 피해자 F( 여, 21세) 이 피고인의 게임을 방해한다는 이유로 게임 내 다른 이용자들도 함께 참여하는 채팅 방에서 피해자에게 “F 걸레 라 던 데, 내가 마이 따 묵 앗지, 맛 존 1 나게 없더라”, “ 보 1 지도 시 1 발 꺼 전복처럼 시꺼멓더라.

너 거 엄마 몸 팔고 다니면 얻을 수 잇는 게 돈이다, 시 1발 새 꺄”, "F 섹 1 스~ 보 1지~ 짬 1지~" 등의 메시지를 보냄으로써, 컴퓨터 등 통신매체를 통하여 피해자에게 성적 수치심이나 혐오감을 일으키는 말을 도달하게 하였다.

Defendant

In addition, the Defendant did not make any speech that may cause sexual humiliation or aversion to the victim of his defense counsel.

The argument is asserted.

Judgment

The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial has the burden of proving the facts charged in the criminal trial, and the conviction should be based on the evidence with probative value that makes the judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is no doubt as to the defendant's guilt, the interest of the defendant should be determined (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Do8675, Mar. 9, 2006). The facts charged in the instant case refers to the defendant's speech that the defendant connects the DPC room to E that may cause sexual humiliation or aversion to the victim. According to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the defendant at the time of the instant case was part of the defendant.

DIt is recognized that the ID "G" was the defendant by linking the victim to E in the PC room and dividing the dialogue with the victim.

However, if the police acknowledges and agree to commit the crime of suspension of indictment or minor fine punishment, the defendant commits the crime.