All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

The acquittal portion

1. On February 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 05:00 on February 14, 2018, at the Defendant’s house located in Jinando-gun B apartment C, the victim D (n, 54 years old) who is the spouse, was suspected of the Defendant’s external appearance; and (b) knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

2. Determination

A. According to the contents of the Defendant’s exercise of force against the Defendant’s victim, the Defendant consistently stated in the investigative agency and this court that the Defendant only knife the Defendant’s knife of the Defendant’s knife in order to keep the part of the Defendant’s knife by knife with knife, and that there is no knife ink as stated in the facts charged. 2) The Defendant stated to the effect that the Defendant knife the Defendant’s knife and knife the Defendant’s knife with the Defendant’s hand.

However, in this court, the victim stated to the effect that the defendant did not do so by putting the victim's hand, and that at the time, the victim did not see whether the victim was a kitchen or clothes in his hand or not, but the defendant was only knife the victim's hand, but when the police made a statement, the victim stated to the effect that he did not mean that the defendant was able to take his hand while she was knife by blicking the defendant's act and blicking the defendant's hand.

3) In light of the consistent change of the defendant’s statement and the change of the victim’s statement, it is difficult to believe the victim’s statement at the police station as it is, and only recognized by the defendant’s hand over the victim’s hand over. (B) Whether the defendant’s act was the victim’s bodily injury refers to the injury of the victim’s completeness or physiological function.

In the daily life of the injured party who is accompanied by the violence, it is extremely minor and there is no violence.