A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and a fine of ten million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while serving as an industrial officer (Grade V) in the Korean Intellectual Property Office, was commissioned from May 201 to December 201 as a member of the E Service Design Deliberation Committee. When the Defendant is selected as a design consulting committee member in various design and package deal projects ordered by the E Service, the Defendant was in charge of evaluating the design documents, etc. submitted by each company participating in the tender of the said package deal projects.

1. The Defendant was asked by the President of the F (State) Waste Group G (hereinafter “F”) who intends to participate in various works ordered by the E Service (hereinafter “F”) to the effect that, in the event that he is selected as a design advisory committee member, the Defendant intended to change the “F” in the design review.

After that, the Defendant was selected as a deliberation member of the “H project” ordered by the E Service, and around February 25, 201, the Defendant awarded a higher score in the “F” participating in the tender at the time of the foregoing design examination.

On April 201, the Defendant received KRW 5 million in cash from G to the effect that the Defendant gave a high score at the time of design examination at the Daejeon Seosung-gu International Apartment shop, Daejeon, which is the Defendant’s residence.

2. The Defendant received a request from K (K) (former L Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “K”) (former L Co., Ltd.”) that participated in the tender of “J projects” ordered by the E Authority to request that the design examination of the foregoing project would change the higher points to K.

After that, on August 18, 201, the Defendant gave high scores to K when examining the design of the above installation project.

On September 201, the Defendant received KRW 5 million in cash from M to the purport that the Defendant’s vehicle that led to the discharge from active service in the Daesung-gu of war was awarded high points when examining the said design.

Accordingly, the defendant received a bribe of 10 million won in total on two occasions in relation to the duties of public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;