logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.11.23 2018고단1487
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 1487] The Defendant is a person who has operated a real estate brokerage office in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Real Estate Office.

1. At the above office around May 2015, the Defendant stated that “A victim D, who became aware of a customer in the course of brokering a house, lent money to the customer who purchased real estate and later borrowed money including interest, etc., to the customer who subsequently collected the balance.”

However, the Defendant secured real estate at a higher price prior to this, and borrowed money from other persons to sell the real estate at a higher price. However, the Defendant continued to increase the amount of the principal or the amount of the principal and the amount of the principal and the amount of the principal and the amount of the principal to be paid repeatedly due to the absence of the purchaser of the real estate or the change of the real estate policy, etc., and the cause of repeated loaning and selling damages to the wind that caused the decline in the price of the real estate. The income of the office alone leads to the situation in which the principal and the amount of the principal and the amount of the principal and the amount of the principal and the amount of the principal and the amount of the principal and the amount of the principal and the amount of

Nevertheless, on June 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received KRW 12 million from the victim to the Defendant’s E bank account on June 17, 2015; and (c) received KRW 160,000,000 from the Si to December 16, 2015, total sum of 160,000 won, such as the list of crimes (1) in attached Form 1.

2. On April 2016, the Defendant told the victim G, a neighboring resident, that “if he/she lends money to customers, he/she would be able to obtain profits when he/she borrowed money on the house as collateral.”

However, the defendant is identical to the above Paragraph 1.

arrow