1. As to KRW 274,536,00 and KRW 52,00,00 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff the full payment day from November 8, 2014 to the day of full payment.

1. Facts of premise;

A. The Plaintiff is a self-management council composed of sectional owners of the 7th and 8th of the 7th of the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ground D Commercial Building (hereinafter “instant commercial building”), and the E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) is a corporation established by the Plaintiff for the management and operation of the instant commercial building.

B. The Plaintiff and E, a joint lessor, around September 2006, leased the instant commercial building to the Defendant by setting the deposit amount of KRW 400 million, monthly rent of KRW 26,00,000, and the period from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 201.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). The Defendant agreed to deposit the difference in the instant lease agreement into a bank account in the name of the representative of the Plaintiff at the time of the Plaintiff’s autonomous president.

I (Defendant) took occupancy in the instant commercial building and withdraw from the instant commercial building without paying rent of KRW 274,536,000, even if he/she set off the deposit of KRW 400 million up until December 31, 201.

He shall endeavor to fully repay the unpaid amount with due diligence after the completion of the iron.

C. On January 2012, the Defendant, at the time of the Plaintiff, drafted and sent to F of the Autonomous Council Chairperson F, a representative of the Plaintiff, a letter of undertaking with the following contents (hereinafter “instant letter of undertaking”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 to 3, Evidence No. 1 to 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the premise of the cause of the claim, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff unpaid rent of KRW 274,536,00 and delay damages therefor, barring special circumstances.

[In light of the fact that the Plaintiff and E agreed to deposit the Plaintiff in the instant lease agreement, the Defendant prepared and provided the Plaintiff’s self-governing president F with the instant promise, and that E was a corporation established by the Plaintiff for convenience in the management of the instant commercial building, it appears that there exists an indivisible claim agreement between the Plaintiff, E, and the Defendant that the Plaintiff would be paid the Plaintiff’s rent from the Defendant.]