logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2017.11.07 2017가단3002
건물명도
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B delivers each real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. Defendant C, D, and E shall be listed in the separate sheet.

Reasons

In full view of the purport of each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, on February 26, 2016, the plaintiff leased each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the building of this case") to defendant B with a deposit of KRW 5 million, annual rent of KRW 40 million, and annual rent of KRW 30 million from March 24, 2016 to March 23, 2019. The plaintiff notified defendant B of the fact that the lease contract of this case was terminated on three (3) months prior to the date of annual rent, and that the above contract was terminated (hereinafter "the lease contract of this case"). The plaintiff notified defendant B of the fact that the lease contract of this case was terminated on three (3) months prior to the date of annual rent payment, but the plaintiff notified the above fact that the lease contract of this case was terminated on three (4) years prior to the end of the lease contract of this case, the plaintiff paid the above contract to the defendant B was paid to the defendant B by 2017.

According to the above facts, Defendant B did not pay the rent in 2017 because it violated the obligation to pay the rent under the instant lease agreement, and accordingly, Defendant B terminated the instant lease agreement on March 23, 2017 due to the arrival of the Plaintiff’s notification on December 24, 2016.

Therefore, Defendant B is obligated to deliver it to the Plaintiff as the lessee of the instant building, and Defendant C, D, and E are obligated to leave the instant building.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow