logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.08.28 2019고단1013
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The evidence seized by the defendant shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 19, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution on July 27, 2018 at the Changwon District Court, which was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc., but the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 27, 2018, but the sentence of suspension of the execution on July 9, 2019 was revoked.

【Criminal Facts】

On December 19, 2018, the Defendant posted a notice to the Internet K site stating “L 10 weeks’ “I sell contact tickets” at the Internet site, and false statement to the victim M who contacted the Defendant stating that “I will sell tickets if I send KRW 249,000.”

However, in fact, even if the defendant did not possess a contact pocket and received money from the victim as the price for the ticket, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the ticket to the victim.

The Defendant received KRW 249,00 from the victim to the Obank account in the name of N on the same day, and received KRW 19,91,700 in total over 85 times from September 12, 2018 to March 18, 2019 in the same manner as shown in attached Table 1.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victims.

On July 19, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution on July 27, 2018 at the Changwon District Court, which was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc., but the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 27, 2018, but the sentence of suspension of the execution on July 9, 2019 was revoked.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant, around September 19, 2018, posted a victim Q on the Internet “P” website at a place (P) in Sungwon-dong, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-dong, Sungwon-dong (hereinafter “P”), stated that “The Defendant would purchase the Google card” by communicating the victim with the victim, and would notify the victim of the amount of KRW 40,000 upon deposit with the advance payment of KRW 50,000.”

However, the facts are that the defendant does not hold the Google card, and even if he receives money from the victim with the purchase price of the Google card, he does not receive money from the victim.

arrow