1. Defendant E: (a) from July 8, 2017, respectively, KRW 3,00,000 to Plaintiff A and each of them.

1. On July 17, 2017, the Plaintiff (GG) who was enrolled in the fifth grade of the F Elementary School, participated in the IHam field of the year 2017, which was a juvenile organization activity conducted at the H camping site in Gwangju City from around July 17, 2017 to July 12:00.

On July 8, 2017, J (K) who took part in the above summer field as of the fourth grade of the F elementary school caused an accident (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) that caused the Plaintiff’s heavy water to be sprinked down to both bucks of the Plaintiff A, who is taking meals in the table, due to the error that he moved the smells containing heavy water at the time of an absprinking (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

Plaintiff

A은 이 사건 사고로 양측 대퇴부 열탕화상 10%(2도 6%, 심재성 2도 2%, 3도 2%)의 진단을 받아 2017. 7. 19. 양측 대퇴부 세 부위(각 132㎠, 56㎠, 16㎠)에 가피절제술과 자가피부 이식수술을 받고, 현재까지도 치료 중이다.

Plaintiff

B and Plaintiff C are the parents of Plaintiff A, Defendant Gyeonggi-do is the local government to which the F Elementary School belongs, Defendant D is the principal of F Elementary School at the time of the instant accident, and Defendant E is the mother of J.

[Ground of recognition] A.1 through 7 (including each number in the case with a serial number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Claim against Defendant E

A. 1) According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant E is liable for tort pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Act against the Plaintiff as a result of the smelling of hot water, and the J saw the Plaintiff’s image. However, Defendant E is liable for damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident, as he/she was a minor aged 10 at the time of the instant accident due to the fifth grade of elementary school, and there is no intelligence to change his/her responsibility for such act. As such, Defendant E, who is legally obligated to supervise the said act, is liable for compensating for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident. 2) Defendant E, the Plaintiff B and C, immediately after the instant accident, did not have the Plaintiff undergo proper hospitalized treatment.

The evidence submitted by the above defendant alone is about the expansion of damage to the plaintiff side.