logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.11 2013나5939
손해배상(의)
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 21,414,932 and to the plaintiff July 2008.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 9, 2007, the Plaintiff visited C Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) with knee and gnee-gying pain, etc., and was diagnosed as the left-hand YI, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the fel-wing loss and the fel-wing type, etc., and received a first operation at the Defendant Hospital’s left-hand side to treat the treatment.

B. However, after the first operation, the Plaintiff received radiation shooting and blood tests from the Defendant hospital, which led to the aggravation of the pain of the part of the operation (hereinafter “the second operation”). On July 1, 2008, the Plaintiff again received metal removal and climatic removal from the left-hand part of the Defendant hospital (hereinafter “the second operation”).

C. After the first surgery, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at the Defendant Hospital as being accompanied by active hepatitiss as a result of the first surgery, which was diagnosed as a free-shaped maleing male and maleing male-male-male-male-male-male-male-male-male-satum.

At present, the plaintiff has a permanent obstacle to his/her subordinate to the left-hand level due to an infection.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 3, the result of each request for the appraisal of medical records to the chief of the Central University Hospital of the court of first instance, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (i) The plaintiff's assertion was negligent in failing to accurately fix the bones at the time of the first operation, which led to the plaintiff's negligence on the part of the left-hand part of the pipe.

B. The written evidence No. 1 and the written evidence No. 1 of the first instance court’s request for each medical record appraisal on the director of the central university hospital of the first instance court, added to the whole purport of the argument as a result of the written request for the medical record appraisal on the school room of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the law of the Seoul university of the Seoul university of the first instance.

arrow