Text
1. The Defendant, on August 7, 2014, deposited by the Cheongju District Court No. 2339 in order to KRW 128,22,570.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Land expropriation and expropriation compensation deposit 1) The land expropriation and expropriation compensation are 625 square meters, C forest land 397 square meters, and D forest land 92 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).
on April 26, 1973, the registration of transfer of ownership (hereinafter referred to as the “registration of transfer of ownership of this case”) arising from sale on January 13, 1973 in the name of E (Korean and foreign reasons, and address on the registry: F in Yeong-gun), respectively.
(2) The Defendant admitted the instant land during the process of implementing G development projects, and deposited KRW 128,222,570 (hereinafter “instant deposit”) with the Cheongju District Court No. 2339 in 2014, by making the deposited person “E and address unknown (F on the certified copy of the register of register”).
B. On January 2, 1986, E, the Defendant’s heir of E and the division of the inherited property, died on January 2, 1986, and E’s children died on August 6, 1958. However, I died on August 6, 1958, before E’s death, and M is considered as deceased on December 10, 2014 (the expiration of the positive period of August 15, 1970), and eventually, H, Plaintiff, J, K, K, and L inherited the property of the above E. (2) but on March 2, 2015, H, Plaintiff, J, K, K, and L agreed on the division of the inherited property of the Plaintiff on March 2, 2015.
3) The Plaintiff rejected the Plaintiff’s withdrawal to the effect that it cannot be confirmed that the Plaintiff is the heir of E, who is the owner on the registry of the instant land. The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit (based on recognition) without dispute. [Attachment] Facts, Gap’s 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 13, 14, 1, 2, and 3 evidence (where there are spot numbers, each entry in the number number, and the purport of the entire pleadings, and the purport of the entire pleadings.
2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment as to the plaintiff
A. The plaintiff's assertion is the same person E (the address at the time of the transfer registration of ownership: N97 of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government) and E (F) on the above registry, and it is also about the instant deposit.