Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

On February 15, 2018, the Defendants were in a mutual-person relationship. On the street store located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheong-gu, the Defendant told the Victim E-gu F of the Victim E (year 21) to see that the Defendant would buy a call tamp, but set a vision with the victim.

Accordingly, Defendant A had his face against the victim who has falbbling falth, and had his face falbling on the drinking. Defendant B also had his face falbling together with the drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Application of the police statement-related Acts and subordinate statutes to F;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for negligence

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants subject to suspended execution: The summary of the facts charged in this part of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the dismissal of prosecution is as follows. Defendant A assaulted the victim G (year 21)’s face at the time and place indicated in the above facts charged by Defendant A once a week.

This is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Code and cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim in accordance with paragraph (3) of the same Article.

However, on December 11, 2018, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the victim withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant. Thus, this part of the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.