logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.04.28 2015고단3463
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The accused is a person who is engaged in driving a KS5 car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused before the risk), a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act;

On November 15, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol on blood at around 02:40, proceeded with the front road of the Seoyang-gu Seoyang-gu, Taeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, the territory of which is 0.282%, toward the high view view on the side of the parallel.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as making a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle abundance and left and left well, and accurately manipulating the operation and steering gear, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to drive normally due to influence of drinking so that he was unable to drive, and the victim C(24 ) who was stopped for the signal waiting in the front bank due to the negligence of neglecting it, and stopped for the signal waiting in the front bank, and the back part of the Darb lur vehicle driven by the victim C(24 ) was shocked in front of the defendant's K5 boarding vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim C and the victim E (Woo 22 years old), who was accompanied by the said occupational negligence, on the part of the Defendant, about 10-day medical treatment. At the same time, at the same time, damaged the said vehicle by soften-day repair cost to cover approximately KRW 404,728.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act is a holder of BK5 automobiles.

No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the car without mandatory insurance at the time and place above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Written estimate;

1. A statement of alcohol alcohol or a report on the detection of a primary driver during blood transfusion (the result of blood collection);

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. As to the aggravated punishment, etc. of specific crimes as provided in the corresponding Article of the Act.

arrow