Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle B with detached motor vehicles.

On June 28, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 16:00, while driving the car at around 16:0, the Defendant driven the two-lane of the D cafeteria in front of the D cafeteria at the time of racing, along the one-lane, driven from the right to the clordular distance on the visible side.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving service is obliged to thoroughly operate the front line and safely operate the tea.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the negligence of driving the center line in two lanes opposite to that of the victim E(60) driving on the two-lane opposite to that of the latter, and received the left front part of the said vehicle as the left front part of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence on July 8, 2015, caused the death of the said victim due to acute heart suspension at a hospital specified in 351 Posco as at the south-gu Posco, Nam-gu, Masco, where he was under the treatment for transmission, and caused the victim G (29 years of age) who was on board the same vehicle as the said victim to undergo approximately two weeks of treatment, and caused the victim H (53 years of age) who was on board the same vehicle to receive a fluorous surgery for about two days, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a report on the occurrence of each traffic accident, a report on the actual condition survey, on-site photographs, and a certificate of death, and a certificate of diagnosis in each case;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (the occupational and practical injury or the occupational and practical injury);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act concerning the ordinary concurrent crimes (a punishment provided for in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents due to the heavy business among the above crimes, and the grave business and the death of a person who has committed the crime);

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following sentencing) shall be suspended.