The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although there was a fact that a mistake of fact-finding defendant damaged a flower, the court below convicted the defendant of the above part by misunderstanding the fact, even though he did not damage microphones and inedible.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (three million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court found the following facts based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, i.e., the Defendant: (a) reported the fact that H was singing out at the instant singing bar; (b) the two persons who were singing out microphones cited by H; and (c) the Defendant asserted that H was sing out by hand his head sing out; (d) the Defendant singing out the singingle of the single, hinginging the single of the single, hinginging the Defendant into the hand; and (e) the Defendant single of the single of the single of the single of the single of the single of the instant bar; and (e) the Defendant’s assertion that single of the single of the sleak and the sleing of the sleak was found to have not been able to be aware of the Defendant’s testimony and the s testimony.

B. Although the Defendant suffered an injury by assault from H and B, the Defendant first deducteds H from H to s and satisfy and caused H’s fighting with H’s head satfy, and the Defendant committed violence.