beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s order from November 19, 2016 to the Plaintiffs as to each of the money indicated in the attached Table 1 “Difference” and each of the said money.
Reasons
1. Details, etc. of ruling;
(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: AF Housing Redevelopment and rearrangement - Project implementer: Defendant - Public notice: May 7, 2015;
B. Adjudication on expropriation made on September 30, 2016 by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City: The date of expropriation: Each land listed in the table No. 1 through No. 4, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 27 through 30 (hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case”) and each land listed in the table No. 1, No. 5, No. 1, 16, 27 or 30 (hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case”) and the Plaintiff E, F, G, L, M, N, M, NA, TR, AC, AD, AD, and net AH (the deceased before the instant lawsuit of this case was filed, Plaintiff AE inherited 1/2 or 30 of the No. 30 of the table No. 1, 10, 110, 15, 16, 27 or 30 of this case, and each of the column No. 1 through No. 51, Z.
- An appraisal corporation: the central appraisal corporation and the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter referred to as “appraisals on expropriation”) (hereinafter referred to as “appraisals on expropriation”), and the result of appraisal is referred to as “the result of appraisal on expropriation”)
C. As a result of the court appraiser's appraisal by the AI, "court appraisal compensation" in the attached Table 1 sheet is described respectively.
(hereinafter the above appraiser shall be referred to as "court appraiser" and the result of the appraisal shall be referred to as "court appraisal result" / [based on recognition] The facts of no dispute, each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the court appraiser's appraisal, the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. Since the plaintiffs' alleged acceptance and adjudication appraiser have assessed excessive compensation by excessively lowering the value of each of the lands of this case and a sectioned building, the defendant should additionally pay the difference between the reasonable compensation according to the court's appraisal result and the compensation according to the appraisal result.
3. In addition to the relevant laws and subordinate statutes, the entry shall be as follows.