1. The Defendant shall pay to Plaintiff F, G, and H each of the money indicated in the “personal fee” column in the attached Table 1 attached hereto, and each of them.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: I Housing Redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter “instant project”) and the area related to the said project (hereinafter “instant project”): Defendant - Public notice of project implementation authorization: Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public notice of November 7, 201

B. Decision on expropriation made on July 24, 2015 by the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee - The date of expropriation: Land and obstacles indicated in the attached Table 1 attached hereto (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”): Compensation: Attached Table 1, which is owned by the Plaintiffs - The same as the entry in the “amount of adjudication on expropriation” in attached Table 1 - An appraisal corporation: the Uniform Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisals on expropriation”): the Uniform Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisals on expropriation”), the result of appraisal in expropriation; hereinafter referred to as “the result of appraisal by expropriation”).

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on March 24, 2016 - Compensation: The same as the statement in the column for “amount of the objection” in attached Form 1 - An appraisal corporation: A certified public appraisal corporation, a Gad Public Appraisal Corporation, a Gad Public Appraisal Corporation and a Gad Public Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Objectioned Appraisal Corporation,” and “the result of appraisal of the objection”) / [based grounds for recognition] without dispute; the entries in subparagraphs 1, 3, 3, 3, and 4 (including each number in case of additional numbers); and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiffs’ assertion 1) Plaintiffs A, B, C, D, and E (hereinafter “Plaintiff A, etc.”)

(2) With respect to each of the lands and obstacles owned by the Plaintiff A et al. (hereinafter “Plaintiff F et al.”) and the Plaintiff et al., there is an error of law by erroneously applying the factors to be considered in assessing the land and obstacles above. Therefore, with respect to the Plaintiff et al., each of the above amounts should be increased by KRW 500,000, rather than the amount of the adjudication on expropriation. 2) As to each of the lands owned by the Plaintiff F, G, and H (hereinafter “three parties, such as Plaintiff F, etc.”), the compensation shall be paid as a result of the court’s appraisal.