logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.05.24 2013고합48
유해화학물질관리법위반(환각물질흡입)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

A candidate for medical treatment and custody shall be punished by medical treatment and custody.

Seized mocoke.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On November 1, 2011, the defendant and the applicant for medical treatment and custody (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") are sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act by the Incheon District Court for ten months on September 9, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence on September 9, 2012, and there is a habit that inhales substances, the same criminal records of which are nine times and are likely to be abused or harmful.

At around 08:30 on January 24, 2013, the Defendant inhaled about one hour at the fifth floor of the office building in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seoul, and seven industrial ocoke (Evidence No. 1) that contains hallucinogenic substances purchased at the iron shop in the vicinity of the bar bar, in a conspiracy to a vinyl paper, and then in a manner of exposing the bar bar at the entrance of the bar.

Defendant needs to receive medical treatment at a medical treatment and custody facility and is in danger of recidivism.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Photographs;

1. Records before and after judgments: Criminal records, etc., investigation reports (written judgments during the period of repeated crime of a suspect and reports on attachment of criminal records for the same kind of crime), and investigation reports (including reports on Toluene ingredients in the main body);

1. The Defendant’s crime of this case committed on September 9, 201 by being sentenced ten months to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime on the following grounds: (a) considering the following circumstances acknowledged by the aforementioned evidence; (b) the Defendant, after 205, was punished for the same crime two times a year or one to nine times a year; and (c) on November 11, 201, the Defendant committed the same kind of crime on September 9, 201 after being sentenced to imprisonment with labor for the same crime on the same crime, for about four months; (d) the number of the scamd itself at the time of the instant crime, as well as the degree of the scamd’s improvement; and (e) in light of the fact that there is serious symptoms caused by addiction such as scambling of hallucinogenic substances, the Defendant’s personality and behavior, and this.

arrow