1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is a foundation that operates the ordinary university hospital (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”), and the network D (hereinafter “the network”) is a person who died upon the Defendant’s hospital’s implementation of the co-fluorcing chlorisome surgery at the Defendant hospital. The Plaintiff A’s spouse, Plaintiff B, and C are the deceased’s children.

B. 1) During the process of the implementation of the instant co-operation test, the deceased, as the head seems to be the head, was transferred to the Egyptian department on April 30, 2012, and there was no special opinion as a result of the brain-computer photographing (cerebrT) examination, but became an emergency room of the Defendant hospital because it was suspected that he/she was dead of a prop-offing transfusion. 2) The deceased, at a certain time, taken the cerebrovascular surgery (Brain Angiogragrathy CT) conducted in the emergency room of the Defendant hospital, taken the changes of the bloodline at a certain time or obtained 3D images at a certain intervals at a time.

As a result, it was confirmed that two 4 meters and three meters size of 3 meters were each located in the upper end of the low prop-proponed busing and the right side of the traffic busing and the upper end of the inner beer.

The deceased tried to conduct a close inspection later, and received a drug treatment for both copies and high blood pressure, and discharged a new wall on the same day.

3) On May 1, 2012, the Deceased returned to the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital again on two copies. As a result, the deceased’s implementation of brain self-processed images and cerebrovascular Angro (MR), 4Vsao, 2.9m in 2.9m in the right side traffic x 2.4m in the size x 2.2m in the right side traffic x 2.0m in the upper end of the road, 2.0m in the size of non-heropic dynamics of 2.0m in the right side x 2.0m in the size of 2.0m in the upper end of the road, the left side of the traffic beer and the connection with non-heropic tension of 3m in the size of 3m in the upper end of the road, respectively.

The Deceased was transferred to the F Hospital by wanting to receive treatment from the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital. However, the Deceased refused to receive treatment from the F Hospital and discharged it.