beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2018 Highest 2372"
1. Larceny;
A. The Defendant from around 08:00 on May 17, 2018 to the same year
5. From 20:00 to 12:00, at the C parking lot located in Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si, a set of a door that was parked in the said parking lot and entered the door, and the victim E with cash of 70,000 won in that place.
B. At around 11:00 on June 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened a door that was parked at the above parking lot, and entered the door, and (b) stolen the door with a bank with one payment from the street north 1 in the market price in the victim G owned by the Defendant.
C. On July 5, 2018, around 07:00, the Defendant opened and opened a door that was parked in the H LP car in front of the Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si, and cut off with one J card owned by the victim I in that door.
2. On July 5, 2018, the Defendant, at around 10:15, purchased three pieces of tobacco at a convenience store for the management of the victim Lane located in Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si, and as if there was a legitimate right to use the card, as described in paragraph (1)(c) above, presented it to the above victim and settled the account, and the Defendant received three copies of tobacco equivalent to KRW 120,000 from the victim.
Accordingly, the defendant used stolen credit cards and received property by deceiving the victim.
The Defendant, around 14:50 on October 28, 2018, colored the object of the crime for the purpose of theft of the inside of the vehicle at the O parking lot located in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, and confirmed the fact that the Defendant was not corrected by opening the top door of Qua car, the victim P, who was parked in the place, was in possession of the vehicle, and found the fact that the Defendant was not corrected. However, even if the Defendant colored the body of the Defendant’s property sealed inside the vehicle, it was confirmed that the said situation was CCTV, and the victim turned out from the outside, was not stolen.