A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 2016, the Defendant: (a) 18:00 Scambling, B, the victim C was removed from a license plate attached to D Dabb where the victim was stolen.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. On September 2016, the Defendant of unlawful use of air defense and unlawful use of air defense, and the Defendant of unlawful use of air defense events: (a) installed the number plate on his/her otoba, which he/she acquired at the public parking lot for observation stations with 47 obam 2-ro 2-om of Man-si, Man-si, and operated the above Obababa on the roads within the Sim-dong-dong and Samsung Heavy Industries from around that time until December 17:15, 2016.

In this respect, the defendant used the official symbol illegally and exercised it for the purpose of exercising it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to numbers, plates and photographs to be attached to ozones;

1. Relevant Article 360 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, Article 360 of the option of punishment (the embezzlement of deserted articles in possession, the option of imprisonment), Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act (the unlawful use of public marks) and Article 238 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of an unlawful use air defense event);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution appears to be against each of the crimes in this case, and the fact that there are no other criminal records except the punishment of a fine for violating the Automobile Management Act in 2003, and the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered comprehensively and the punishment is determined as ordered by the above Article 51 of the Criminal Act.