Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 1, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution at the Ulsan District Court for the crime of interference with business, and was sentenced to the said judgment on October 31, 2013, and was serving as field members of the Korea Trade Union E branch.

On March 22, 2013, from around 6:50 to 7:00, the Defendant re-entered the victim E Co., Ltd. 3 factory located in Ulsanbuk-gu, U.S., and from around 7:00 on the same day, the Defendant agreed with the E Co., Ltd. to hold on-site briefing meetings against the relevant fair workers by not later than 7:00 on the same day in connection with an accident where the loss of workers who worked to start the engine at the above factory was exposed, but the E Co., Ltd. had been consulted with the E Co., Ltd., to hold on-site briefings, on the ground that the TGV of the 376 process, 32 Ra of the chairman of the 32D of the Factory, automatically moved the 376 process from around 06:52 on the ground that he automatically moved the 376 process of production, and that he will not hold the Defendant liable for the suspension of production.”

Accordingly, the defendant suspended the above 32 productionRa of the above factory for 170 minutes and prevented the production of a car with 99 automobiles such as Abago and i30, thereby hindering the victim's automobile manufacturing work by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. Statement to the prosecution of I;

1. Three factory situation photographs and on-site photographs of illegal acts;

1. Current status of production loss of three factories;

1. Previous conviction: A written inquiry of criminal records, etc., and a written inquiry of investigation report (the attachment of a written judgment, etc.) by defense counsel’s defense counsel’s assertion, pointing out that the defense counsel is innocent.

At the time of the instant case, since the private sector operated a horse in violation of the matters agreed between labor and management, the on-site representative is authorized to suspend the Radong, and the Defendant is authorized to act as a representative in the absence of a representative as a on-site member.

Therefore, the current Lone-dong is subject to protection.